In Fisher’s book he describes the shift
from a Fordist era to the post-Fordist era, explaining the transformation of
important characteristics such as production. The shift from an industrial
phase to a spirits-of-networks phase meant power was no longer defined by structural
class divisions and was instead associated with the characteristic of
autonomous nodes and connections with other nodes in the networks. The biggest
change was the blurring of boundaries between producers and consumers creating
a new category of workers: the prosumers.
A new technology that has the potential to further
revolutionize the concept of production is 3D
Printing. This technology further blurs the line between consumer and creator, possibly
posing a threat to corporations as more people are able to produce their own
products. What do you think this means for our economy and our capitalist
structure if more people can fulfill their own desires instead of buying these
fulfillments from corporations? Check
out this interesting video to see how far 3D printing can go. A venture capitalist made a statement that 3D printing will
have a bigger economic impact than the internet. While this is a bold statement, I do think this technology will force our society to
rethink ways of design and production, just like the Internet did. It will
be interesting to see what the discourse will be around this technology once it
becomes cheaper and more accessible to more people. Since it makes it easier
for people to produce products in their home and sell them, this will bring up
political issues in creating policies to address copyright issues and
regulations that people might be bypassing. Power will be further
defined by the network (downloading and sharing 3D models with others on the
network to use with their 3D printer). How else does this impact economic,
social, and political institutions?
3D printing is a new technological device that will have a great impact society, economically, socially and politically. Technology will change the way we design and produce products as it becomes more easily available and accessible. There are both positives and negatives associated with 3D printing such as user created products and its use in health science to create organs but it may also have negative impacts such using 3D printing to make weapons. It also blurs the line of weapon boarder regulations, a file of a gun that may not be allowed in a country can easily be sent over the Internet and then 3D printed. New policy regulations will be needed to ensure the safety and ethics of society. Overall, 3D printing is a new development that will advance society and creator content but will also have negative impacts that will need regulation and laws set in place.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAs mentioned previously, 3D printing has the potential to revolutionize production by giving consumers the power to use their creativity to produce their own products. With this in mind, there seems to be endless possibilities of products that can be made from 3D printing. I just recently became aware that houses have been made from 3D printing in China. However, 3D printing allows for weapons to be produced easier within the homes of people. This is where especially regulations need to be discussed, evaluated and enforced in order to protect us citizens. The potential of 3D printing to affect us socially is very profound. Yet what is done with this new power of production needs to be taken into great consideration.
ReplyDeleteHere is a link about houses made by 3D printing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYqBxEAtXZA
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI just kept getting ideas from all your posts. Well mostly examples. In the hit TV show Key and Peele, they have a sketch (I tried to post here but its not available in our great country) where they are civilians who are protecting the plane they are on from "terries" (terrorists). The 3D printed a gun in case these "terries" get "froggy". The skit is hilarious. The point being, anyone can 3D print anything. Nicole and Sarah both mentioned the potential for these. Whats to stop every neighborhood watch being armed to the teeth and try to take action into their own hands. They don't know the law.
ReplyDeleteAnother example is for the potential for 3D printing. In the video Diana shared about the potential for 3D printing, they mentioned the ability to print tissue and cells. This would be extremely exciting for the medical industry. I recently watched Elysium and they had these med pods that pretty much 3D printed tissue. Yes it is a fictitious movie with Matt Damon but perhaps it can be viewed as an Utopian imaginary that in the future when the technology improves, will become material.
1) Elysium, facial reconstruction (NSFW): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1sL_2nhV0c
2) Elysium, med pod in action again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyMoJHf7rCQ
Edit: Forgot to add links at the beginning
The discussion is extremely common through many of my communication studies courses due to this creation of ‘prosumers’ and the repercussions of them. With this being said there are many social, economic, physical and political impacts through the outcomes of being able to easily 3D print. Economically, 3D printing can very well create a new era due to ‘prosumers’. This can negatively effect our economy from job cuts and no longer needing to buy mass produced products, but possibility could bring it to a new level through the way that new jobs surrounding the production or legislation of printers. This brings myself to my next point which Nicole Martino briefly mentioned. Although we are given freedom to create 3D printed objects, to what extent will our creations be legal? With this being said guns, food or even human body parts can be produced, with limited knowledge of what they will do to us later on (ie. are they up to health standards), or what laws they can break or create (ie. being able to print weapons). To end, I would like to bring attention to how 3D printing is beginning to be brought into the hands of society while many questions left unanswered. Within the link below theres a clip of a German store that focuses on bringing 3D printed candy to its consumers for a 'friendly and fun way' to expose society to this new technology. This ultimately avoiding what I believe is crucial discourse on the repercussions of the new technology.
ReplyDeleteLink: https://www.facebook.com/NowThisNews/videos/922141901209268/?__mref=message_bubble
I agree that 3D printing has the potential to have many social and economic impacts. However, I have found it rather surprising how long it has taken for 3D printing to be used vastly.
ReplyDeleteThis is an incredible technology that appears to be used fairly infrequently (or at least from what I have seen so far). One of the only examples I have seen of 3D printing so far was in the movie Neighbours. I wonder if the reason for the slow adaptation rate is because the technology itself is extremely costly. Like all goods sold in the marketplace, I think that we may have to wait until the price of 3D printing lowers before it becomes widespread and accessible to the common consumer.