Tuesday 29 September 2015

Will 3D Printing Have a Larger Economic Impact Than the Internet?

In Fisher’s book he describes the shift from a Fordist era to the post-Fordist era, explaining the transformation of important characteristics such as production. The shift from an industrial phase to a spirits-of-networks phase meant power was no longer defined by structural class divisions and was instead associated with the characteristic of autonomous nodes and connections with other nodes in the networks. The biggest change was the blurring of boundaries between producers and consumers creating a new category of workers: the prosumers.

A new technology that has the potential to further revolutionize the concept of production is 3D Printing. This technology further blurs the line between consumer and creator, possibly posing a threat to corporations as more people are able to produce their own products. What do you think this means for our economy and our capitalist structure if more people can fulfill their own desires instead of buying these fulfillments from corporations?  Check out this interesting video to see how far 3D printing can go.  A venture capitalist made a statement that 3D printing will have a bigger economic impact than the internet. While this is a bold statement, I do think this technology will force our society to rethink ways of design and production, just like the Internet did. It will be interesting to see what the discourse will be around this technology once it becomes cheaper and more accessible to more people. Since it makes it easier for people to produce products in their home and sell them, this will bring up political issues in creating policies to address copyright issues and regulations that people might be bypassing. Power will be further defined by the network (downloading and sharing 3D models with others on the network to use with their 3D printer). How else does this impact economic, social, and political institutions?

Ayn Rand and pop culture

Hey friends,

Im sure you all remember Ayn Rand from the BBC documentary All Watched Over by
Machines.



She challenged Alterism (man must sacrifice himself for others) with her theory of Objectivism (man must follow his self interest, uninhibited by others). What resonated with me was when she said that "all you need is yourself, because you're the world" as well as "I will not die, its the world that will end."

She seems like she can not be controlled. The Randyan Hero she creates are isolated individuals who are "free" to do as they wish. Not forcing others or being forced by others. She was a supporter of laissez-faire economics. This is where I start to wonder...

Conforming to contemporary market systems does not promote mans freedom to do as they wish. Isn't the current market system more like: "You can have whatever you want, as long as its on the menu"? Is it freedom if you force someone to participate and then tell them that they are free to do as they wish?

I feel like her words carry a lot of value to the individual, do they hold the same weight when applied to a group? A fictional example may be video game titled BioShock which takes place in the ruins of a city which was governed by logic and self-interest.

Bio shock intro with heavy Randyan influence

The speech by Andrew Ryan at around the 3 minute mark is what is significant.

Cheers





Government Surveillance

As 4th year communication studies majors, most of us are familiar with the different debates and opinions that have circulated in regards to surveillance in our society. Many people feel that surveillance is a necessity to keep our society and citizens safe. However, many other people feel that government surveillance is a violation of our privacy and goes against the bill of rights. In the article Articulation and Assemblage, we learned that someone living in New York City is likely to have their photo taken up to 75 times a day simply walking through the city. These cameras are installed by both the government and stores themselves to keep constant surveillance of the city. The authors of this article explain that these enhancements in surveillance are created and expanded from our own feelings and connections. Although there were forms of surveillance prior to the tragedy that took place on September 11, 2001, it is clear that surveillance within society grew drastically after the tragedy. This is based on our own fears and suspicions. The 'assemblage' of surveillance technology is a result of our articulations/connections with the tragedy of 9/11. Attached is a link to a Ted Talk by Christopher Soghoian. He explains the different technologies that have been created by corporations to stalk potential threats in our society and obtain personal information. Soghoian explains that hacking is potentially a necessary evil needed to access the information of people who are harming society, however, we should be informed that this is happening and have a voice in the way it is being done. I agree that people should be aware of the level of surveillance that they are under, to eliminate the level of invasiveness and suspicion. Do you feel that any level of government surveillance is just?

http://www.ted.com/talks/christopher_soghoian_government_surveillance_this_is_just_the_beginning?language=en#t-482138


Wednesday 23 September 2015

Best Internet Thing EVER!


Posted by 白馬 on Sunday, September 6, 2015

Informational Capitalism and the Financial Crisis of 2008



In order to get the party started on this blog, I wanted to give you a couple of resources that will enable you to place the plot of the film Margin Call in the larger consequence of the Financial Crisis of 2008 (and the subsequent so-called "Great Recession" which is still ongoing for many people in many countries).

The history of modern capitalism is frequently punctuated by financial crises where the capital markets crash, implode and/or collapse due to the consequences of their own actions. Please note that financial crises are never something that happens to the markets from the outside; rather, they are the direct result of how the markets are organized and how market actors--collectively as individuals and individually as persons--behave.  In today's class, we will talk about the imaginaries of informational capital/ism and how we can see them manifested in choices that characters in film make.



All of that will make a lot more sense to you if you have some background understanding of what the Financial Crisis of 2008 was all about.  A good place to start is this very simple, very short YouTube video that clearly explains the "credit crisis" that set off the larger financial crisis and started the Great Recession. :




For those of you who want to delve more deeply into the issue, the CBC and the PBS show Frontline produced excellent documentaries about the Crisis and its economic and political aftermath.

The CBC's documentary Meltdown can be found here:




and the PBS Frontline series on "Money, Power and Wall Street" can be found here: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/money-power-wall-street/